From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 22 09:04:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F8E16A4CE for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:04:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDFF43D4C for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:04:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3MG4P86091840; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:04:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i3MG4PaT091839; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:04:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:04:25 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Kirk Strauser Message-ID: <20040422160425.GF78422@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040422104146.GA46862@chuggalug.clues.com> <20040422132631.GA28789@freebie.xs4all.nl> <874qrcf1sp.fsf@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874qrcf1sp.fsf@strauser.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NONAME alpha system up for grabs X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:04:26 -0000 On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 10:52:06AM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > Whoever responds: you sure want the cache rams to go with it, it makes a > > considerable speed difference. It will not get fast, it will get less > > slow, you get the drift. > > I'd asked before but didn't get much of a response: > > I have a Cabriolet (275MHz) with 2MB of cache, and a manual that says I can > increase that to 8. Would that make a noticeable difference in make jobs, > like running a make buildworld? I've timed two Alpha's that differed only in cache size (2MB vs. 4MB). It would make a difference in 'make world' times.