From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 26 06:39:29 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13A916A417 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6114313C465 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lBQ6dPWG096008 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:39:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=prime.gushi.org; s=primegushiorg; t=1198651167; bh=oWTm8Nx3PS1atgvSFZwHdCDN+t4=; h=DomainKey-Signature:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:References:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=k+/6 jKnTJmMwGc3Ub8IyJWDtZblBPfXeu2zEkazL5Sd99zT1PEdLYjcIgScT2F6XTlcQBJn fzwQdgWnLjbEVWQ== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=primegushiorg; d=prime.gushi.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=HHm+RNnQjiNs4l4L3p586tbSNe9VkYRM2QW5jBgWJHOmvhiuj/C9SjsZIZF6NF1U0 MDF00k1gmML0JQcrZ8vDw== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id lBQ6dOUP096007; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:39:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:39:24 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: Jay Chandler In-Reply-To: <4771E0A0.60008@sequestered.net> Message-ID: References: <20071225234859.F75015@prime.gushi.org> <4771E0A0.60008@sequestered.net> User-Agent: Alpine 0.99999 (BSF 796 2007-11-08) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (prime.gushi.org [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:39:27 -0500 (EST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap -- update claims "up to date" but it's not. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:39:29 -0000 On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Jay Chandler wrote: > Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >> Maybe I'm just doing this completely wrong: >> >> prime# portsnap update >> Ports tree is already up to date. >> prime# portsnap fetch >> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap3.FreeBSD.org... done. >> Fetching snapshot metadata... done. >> Updating from Mon Nov 12 18:16:16 EST 2007 to Tue Dec 25 21:36:54 EST 2007. >> Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. >> Applying metadata patches... done. >> Fetching 4 metadata files... >> [and so on] >> >> Am I using this thing wrong? >> >> -Dan > > Yup. 'portsnap fetch update' is the command I use-- the reverse order that > you're using 'em in. Shouldn't I just need one of the two? -Dan -- "You can't call yourself a dork if you don't use UNIX!" -Dan Mahoney, May 1997 --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org ---------------------------