From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 11 17:36:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB69CACBD1C for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35616EE2 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id u2BHZqIr015792; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:35:52 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:35:52 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Carmel cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20160312040723.V61428@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:36:03 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 614, Issue 6, Message: 2 On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:08:15 -0500 Carmel wrote: > I recently installed FreeBSD 11-0 current on a new machine. Now, when I > attempt to run "freebsd-update fetch", I receive the following error > message. > > src component not installed, skipped > Fetching public key from update5.freebsd.org ... failed > (above repeated several times with different URLs) > No mirrors remaining, giving up. > > What am I doing wrong? With respect, and despite the willingness of people here to help with issues, you've either installed an inappropriate version of FreeBSD or are not using the appropriate list for issues with it. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/current-stable.html You may find that running stable/10 - so following the freebsd-stable list - much less of a big leap onto the 'bleeding edge' and sometimes unstable development version that -current is intended to be. cheers, Ian