From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 2 14: 2:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-131.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A9737B402 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:02:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7DE5766C76; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:02:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:02:54 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jean-Yves Lefort Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Security: FreeBSD vs OpenBSD Message-ID: <20020202140254.A9748@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20020202212736.A68642@jsite.lefort.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020202212736.A68642@jsite.lefort.net>; from jylefort@brutele.be on Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 09:27:36PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 09:27:36PM +0100, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > Is OpenBSD more secure than FreeBSD (I don't mean "out of the box", but a= fter > a complete security audit leading to an optimal configuration of the syst= em). FreeBSD's also had comprehensive auditing done on it. I think both are pretty good. Kris --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8XGIOWry0BWjoQKURAvzmAKCHKPlmcnKhbtLaWuj17NyXKx2v2ACg/3iZ APJsO3D5q4Xp7Edj+WxGkxg= =/VC5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message