From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Dec 17 12:21:45 2000 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 17 12:21:43 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D9A37B69D for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:21:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfx-64-6-211-149.users.reflexcom.com ([64.6.211.149]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:19:59 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-64-6-211-149.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBHKLZU43196; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:21:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:21:35 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Kartic Krishnamurthy Cc: Marius Strom , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Staying Stable Message-ID: <20001217122135.I96105@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <00ab01c066c9$fc3ba1c0$0445a8c0@private.solutionsforyou.com> <20001215131816.A86117@marius.org> <002401c0685b$b310a8e0$0445a8c0@private.solutionsforyou.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <002401c0685b$b310a8e0$0445a8c0@private.solutionsforyou.com>; from kaygee@netset.com on Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 02:01:00PM -0500 Sender: cjc@rfx-64-6-211-149.users.reflexcom.com Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 02:01:00PM -0500, Kartic Krishnamurthy wrote: > Thanks all for the response to my first mail... Uh, well, some of us don't remember it so the next question is a little out of context. > How about ports-all? I did an src-all in my cvs upgrade. What is ports-all > or any individual port-* thereof? What exactly does this do? It updates your ports tree (or the relevent piece of it) of course. > Also when I > did an src-all, did the Ports upgrades (Upgrade as in Upgrade Kit of > freebsd.org/ports) also take place or is that a separate process I have to > take care of. No, nothing like that would happen. In fact, you do realize that in doing a CVSup, nothing in the _operational_ portion of your system has been touched at all. You have new source code, but you still need to build a new world and kernel on your own. > Actually, this is what I did..I started with a 3.3R system, did a binary > upgrade to 4.0R and then did a CVS upgrade to 4.2-Stable. Cool. That's the easiest way to do it. > As of 3.3R I had > installed the 3.0 Stable Upgrade Kit from www.freebsd.org/ports home page. > Will my ports upgrade for 4.2 Stable also have taken place with the CVSUP? There are no branches in the ports tree. There are no "ports for 4.2-STABLE." There is only a snapshot of the head of the tree at any one time. Up-to-date ports for 3.5-STABLE are the same as ports for 4.2-STABLE are the same for 5.0-CURRENT, etc. But to reiterate, your CVSup of 4.2-STABLE source has not touched your ports collection at all. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message