Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:24:51 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List <ports@freebsd.org>, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, wen heping <wenheping@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Maintainership of py-zopetesting and py-zopeevent Message-ID: <4E65CAC3.2040705@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E65C964.7070503@yandex.ru> References: <4E64C077.8050403@yandex.ru> <CACi7718digBBkknROiiMXWKHj9J1dx7jZ_VRGD3Q-Pi6fpLDtQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E656B6E.5080105@FreeBSD.org> <4E65C964.7070503@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/06/2011 00:19, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > we already have plenty of portnames with dot in them That's not a good reason to add more. I did read the rest of your post, and while I sympathize with your arguments, I'm not convinced by them. The good news for you however is that I'm not in charge of anything. :) Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E65CAC3.2040705>