From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 17:18:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1993316A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:18:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D8143D46 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:18:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Received: from [10.20.30.249] (dsl2-63-249-109-3.cruzio.com [63.249.109.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j08HIDPL077460; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:18:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20050107210046.2145a571.BSD-Mail@nyc.rr.com> References: <20050107210046.2145a571.BSD-Mail@nyc.rr.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:18:14 -0800 To: John Wilson From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting USB2 on FreeBSD 5.3? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:18:19 -0000 At 9:00 PM -0500 1/7/05, John Wilson wrote: >On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:32:31 -0800 >Paul Hoffman wrote: >[...] >> da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device >> da0: 1.000MB/s transfers >[...] > >For what it's worth, I too am using ehci with a USB2 HD based MP3 player, and >it is being reported similarly as well in regard to the 1.000MB/s transfer >rate. However, according to `systat -vmstat`, I am seeing transfers in the >area of 8MB/s. In regard to stability, I've had no issues at all with it. > >I'm sure this doesn't help at all. ;p Actually, it helps some. I am seeing similar results (well, 7.1 MB/s), so this is a bit heartening. But it doesn't explain why we're not seeing the 50 MB/s we're supposed to be seeing. Anyone else have any clues?