From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 27 17:34:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6321816C77E for ; Sat, 27 May 2006 17:34:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1D1E43D66 for ; Sat, 27 May 2006 17:34:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 75859 invoked from network); 27 May 2006 17:34:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Kxc3LAUeVeVtm6eTOm3ys94N0Qxk6+56NrPBCLz5UZlaXIqGhhMfVd5/+wm+tflft2aHuTeDRKMpb4x56PECM3qQZn97eglsc/yGXnpek/5FlCZ6o11cbKG0WA9W/HS4qKJ022ul0TYM1d1VdrXUmD8HdvufRGaHxrOeArgIUV4= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 May 2006 17:34:25 -0000 Message-ID: <44788DB2.6070709@rogers.com> Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 13:34:42 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Dr. Rich Murphey" References: <20060525174211.46064.qmail@web36315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4475F75C.4090908@rogers.com> <447879D3.1070204@WhiteOakLabs.com> In-Reply-To: <447879D3.1070204@WhiteOakLabs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poor Samba throughput on 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 17:34:41 -0000 Dr. Rich Murphey wrote: > I get 25 to 30MB/sec between FreeBSD 6.0 and Windows XP > clients with tcp.inflight disabled and interrupt polling enabled > on a 1gb link without jumbo frames. > > The various Linux distributions do about the same on this hardware - > 3ware striped raid arrays, dual xeon, and 2Gb ram. > > in smb.conf I'm using: > socket options = TCP_NODELAY > strict locking = no > use sendfile = yes > Adding the last two options of my setup increased the upload rate by about 2MB/s, with peaks totaling to 20MB/s. The download rate has not been effected however. > 6.1 should be easier to tune in that tcp.inflight is selectively > disabled by default for low latency (LAN) connections. I am using -CURRENT here, disabling net.inet.tcp.inflight improves the download rate by 2MB/s!