Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 23:47:30 +0100 (CET) From: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com> To: John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu> Cc: Michael Bretterklieber <mbretter@sbox.tu-graz.ac.at>, freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE:Problems with PicoBSD 0.43 in 3.1-RELEASE Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903242345430.5809-100000@freja.webgiro.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.990324134045.jobaldwi@vt.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, John Baldwin wrote: > I don't belive so because PAM requires dynamic modules (i.e. it can't be > statically compiled in) and AFAIK PicoBSD doesn't support dynamic libaries > and/or modules. That was the reason NOPAM was created in the first place. But since that time John (Polstra) added static version of PAM, and now we're happy again, or unhappy if surprised... Watch out, the things are rolling pretty fast ;-) Andrzej Bialecki // <abial@webgiro.com> WebGiro AB, Sweden (http://www.webgiro.com) // ------------------------------------------------------------------- // ------ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve. http://www.freebsd.org -------- // --- Small & Embedded FreeBSD: http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ ---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9903242345430.5809-100000>