From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 12 07:51:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4726F7B for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:51:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from eu1sys200aog123.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog123.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1307717DA for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob123.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKUbgok8LaaJurq4J9SBWxE2xgm35YDSx2@postini.com; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:51:54 UTC Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id m15so5599492wgh.35 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:51:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to :x-gm-message-state; bh=tgHaI94dpfTADAsrPdmbjLW9p2NHZ/kJ+N2SE8O/i5c=; b=SFxmVoRG+qsMutQ/KsgkC6SCxHkTi8StVYfId+U8IvD/WldbkNGaQsF2q18khH0YbT ATeWnLWV83QF0q/pqmybik04/K2DGeLm+3qdro02BLVNfOzMXZwUq74Au+iLLAsm772I dofqJEMi4vMz18fwuk8sUze5x+Ranlc4eZRvnzVIY0WucQ4/4vd0RBahiK6FcpkeBuv7 ZkgzGUaNWOEmEamYpZHFOfOW2VVthGa+vuk0A92L90bsajcGCk8ZW02rXgTXWTu7Ubyo sNeCDmALWK49fT04Vh0pCs5g0SjmkSBEHaKF2cWRBt6/7ri3u4tY4NVUVB8WynJrbuG7 IGWA== X-Received: by 10.180.13.5 with SMTP id d5mr3561432wic.56.1371023507060; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:51:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.13.5 with SMTP id d5mr3561430wic.56.1371023507006; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dz8sm1495325wib.11.2013.06.12.00.51.45 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Anton Shterenlikht Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r5C7phjB010267 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:51:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r5C7ph11010266; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:51:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:51:43 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201306120751.r5C7ph11010266@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: david@catwhisker.org, x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help debugging xfig lockup? In-Reply-To: <20130612031624.GS1369@albert.catwhisker.org> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn9Y/pdMwQdzEWgsmx/8uKxsWjKV3kS93poeqqfIt2uhRCTEdn/BGyajo/Rwi8JXt0YJEdifq55cz91opddWNR6sHt4tnmSpEU3oS+yzGUvPrKSCRhzL8keaTzA+5J95rrJJabH+UP+Jmws1/w/ERosqhooeA== X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:51:54 -0000 I haven't seen this. I've been using xfig for quite a few years now, on and off, not heavily, on a range of arches and OS versions. Lately I've been using the server/client model. My X setup is bare bones. My X server is sparc64 -current (now at r239940). with PGX64 graphics card, driven by x11-drivers/xf86-video-mach64. My X clients are on ia64 -current (now at r248493) I run xdm on the clients side to which I connect from X server via XDMCP as "X -query ". I run mwm on on the clients side, then xterm and then xfig. Anyway, what I'm trying to say that maybe I haven't seen any problems with xfig because my setup is so simple. I hope you solve your problem, as xfig is still a very useful program. Anton