Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 19:52:41 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>, Omachonu Ogali <oogali@intranova.net> Subject: Re: Postfix upgrade Message-ID: <20000605195241.A56740@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <20000605130607.C7792@argon.gryphonsoft.com>; from andrews@technologist.com on Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 01:06:07PM -0400 References: <20000605130607.C7792@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Will Andrews: > Cc: Omachonu Ogali <oogali@intranova.net>, > Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> [ please keep the Cc:, I'm not on -ports ] > So, please: constructive comments on this topic. I don't want to hear > one single word about "it's labelled ``experimental'', so of course we > shouldn't upgrade to it" kind of arguments. I want to hear REAL > arguments, either for or against this sort of upgrade. Experimental versions have the feature of being the one Wietse is currently running. If it is good enough for Wietse, it is for me. Postfix has been around for a long time now and while during early alpha testing some snapshots were buggy, nowadays they're very stable and give some good features (like the body checks in a recent snap). I'm running snapshots myself and on some of the machines I manage. 400 [19:51] roberto@sidhe:~> postconf mail_version mail_version = Snapshot-20000514 -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 5.0-CURRENT #80: Sun Jun 4 22:44:19 CEST 2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000605195241.A56740>