From owner-cvs-all Tue Sep 22 17:24:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA09823 for cvs-all-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:24:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from hillbilly.hayseed.net (hillbilly.hayseed.net [204.62.130.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA09566; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:23:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from enkhyl@hayseed.net) Received: from hillbilly.hayseed.net (hillbilly.hayseed.net [204.62.130.2]) by hillbilly.hayseed.net (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA02317; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:22:32 -0700 Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:22:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Enkhyl To: Mark Murray cc: Satoshi Asami , eivind@yes.no, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/netscape4-navigator Makefile ports/www/netscape4-navigator/files md5 netscape.sh ports/www/netscape4-navigator/pkg PLIST In-Reply-To: <199809221649.SAA05608@gratis.grondar.za> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 22 Sep 1998, Mark Murray wrote: > wrote: > > * 4.05 has security problems (any random web-page can execute anything > > * it pleases, IIRC). This is IMO more important than any other > > * reliability issue. > > > > Duh. Should I just mark it broken then? > > Naah. Even if the software is a bit ropey, as long as it's not > hopelessly broken, let's let the users bang on it. If the software > will not work or of it has a big security hole, then that is a good > cause for marking BROKEN IMO. To provide user input on this, I would concur with Mark. The software isn't "broken" per se, it's just has some, shall we say, interesting "features" :-) -- Christopher Nielsen Scient: The Art and Science of Electronic Business cnielsen@scient.com