From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Feb  5 13:06:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA23738
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:06:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA23726
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:06:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <15995(4)>; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:05:15 PST
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177478>; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:05:03 -0800
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: List Duplicates 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 03 Feb 1996 13:44:43 PST."
             <199602032144.OAA04394@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:04:58 PST
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <96Feb5.130503pst.177478@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199602032144.OAA04394@phaeton.artisoft.com>you write:
>The list handler needs to write a reply-to that only includes the list
>and rewrite the cc line to remove people on the list (potentially
>removing the cc line entirely).

No!  Argh!  Lists that include Reply-To: headers are *evil*, because it then 
generally gets hard to reply just to the original author privately -- which 
one might think would be good to encourage.

People should just learn to trim their headers.

  Bill