From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 2 14: 5:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.bsws.de (139.n1.ham.bsws.de [213.128.133.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C065137B41B for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:05:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 29435 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2002 22:05:39 -0000 Received: from 005.n1.ham.bsws.de (HELO bsw005.bsws.de) ([213.128.133.5]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.bsws.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 2 Feb 2002 22:05:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 24986 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Feb 2002 22:05:35 -0000 Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 23:05:34 +0100 From: Henning Brauer To: misc@OpenBSD.org Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Security: FreeBSD vs OpenBSD Message-ID: <20020202230534.C20912@bsw005.bsws.de> Mail-Followup-To: misc@OpenBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <20020202212736.A68642@jsite.lefort.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020202212736.A68642@jsite.lefort.net>; from jylefort@brutele.be on Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 09:27:36PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 09:27:36PM +0100, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote: > Is OpenBSD more secure than FreeBSD (I don't mean "out of the box", but after > a complete security audit leading to an optimal configuration of the system). Of course. A computer running OpenBSD is even more secure than a computer not running at all! OpenBSD is even more secure than a diskwasher! The main component in computer security is the box' root. -- http://2suck.net/hhwl.html Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message