Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 10:04:42 -0700 (MST) From: Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu> To: Ruslan@shevchenko.kiev.ua Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, meissner@tu-harburg.d400.de Subject: Re: What we will do with latex2html ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971101095551.19155B-100000@peloton.physics.montana.edu> In-Reply-To: <345B726E.C0C745E@cam.grad.ipri.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all, On Sat, 1 Nov 1997, Ruslan Shevchenko wrote: > In this year was 3 attempts to add latex2html in ports collection: > > ports/3940 Jun 23 1997 Ruslan Shevchenko. ?Ruslan@Shevchenko.kiev.ua> > ports/4103 Jul 22 1997 Frank Meissner ?meissner@tu-harburg.d400.de> > ports/4496 Sep 8 1997 Brett Taylor > ?brett@pelton.physics.montana.edu> > > Now all of this ports is outdated. My port is not what I would consider out of date. It is the last stable release of latex2html, latex2html-97.1. There is a constantly changing development version out there, but I don't think it's a good idea to use that as a port - I'd prefer to have the stable version. Alternatively we could have 2 ports, like we do for gimp, the development and stable version. > 1. Are anybody from authors of previous ports want to > be ports-maintainers of latex2html ? I'm happy to be the maintainer if someone will commit it. > 2. If not, i will report it during week, and send it to > ports collection, if anybody with commit privilegies, > will look on this port in finite time. As noted above I don't think this is worth doing w/ the development version unless we keep separate development and stable ports. ********************************************************* Brett Taylor brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu http://peloton.physics.montana.edu/brett/ "Give a man a beer and he wastes an hour Teach a man to brew and he wastes a lifetime"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971101095551.19155B-100000>