From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 21 09:47:28 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84892106564A;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C888FC1D;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:47:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.100])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA02978;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:47:25 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org)
Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1])
	by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1PUyoW-000L3q-P5; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:47:24 +0200
Message-ID: <4D1077AB.4010707@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:47:23 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101211 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx>
References: <AANLkTi=z1_KWKmhqFjNYHZfgAyPgsUVvgJ0P29KOPpnZ@mail.gmail.com>	<20101211215341.0000097c@unknown>	<AANLkTi=ehLNs8aeYfGUattetm7oMj8HhEB1Vnep9uAZk@mail.gmail.com>	<20101213103535.00005f3d@unknown>	<4D061E00.7050606@freebsd.org>	<AANLkTinJrCRscZwYCAwXERTs6X=-yaz6go3FTSmc6Zdx@mail.gmail.com>	<4D0F3AD6.9080002@freebsd.org>	<AANLkTikkpbJV0v1=mBc+nFBh_diyAjUjaN8BUKwEZZhp@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinRGx-r-MpusXecTpjKbwAUHktM6qPxRxz1B8DX@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinRGx-r-MpusXecTpjKbwAUHktM6qPxRxz1B8DX@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [dtrace] syscall provider naming convention.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:47:28 -0000

on 21/12/2010 11:27 Artem Belevich said the following:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> It would be nice to get the i386 counterpart too when this goes into the tree.
>>
>> Here's updated version that has syscall:linux32 working on i386, too.
>>
>> https://sites.google.com/site/abc678site/files/dt-systrace-20101221.patch.gz
> 
> Forgot to mention. The patch is against stable/8 r216436

The previous version applied fine to head, I think that that should be the case
with this version too.

I have one comment though.  I am not sure about renaming syscall.ko to
syscall_freebsd.ko.  Perhaps we could keep the old name?  Or add a new module
under that name that would load native syscall module and all emulation syscall
modules (if any)?

-- 
Andriy Gapon