From owner-freebsd-gnome Wed Feb 13 15:15: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx5.mail.ru (mx5.mail.ru [194.67.57.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4653937B405; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:15:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from h214.229.dialup.iptcom.net ([212.9.229.214]) by mx5.mail.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.14 #1) id 16b8c5-000PIk-00; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 02:14:58 +0300 Subject: Re: Xscreensaver and GNOME From: Maxim Sobolev To: Ade Lovett Cc: Joe Marcus Clarke , gnome@FreeBSD.ORG, Doug Barton In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MnXBtXazZ8H2eRegxm5G" Message-Id: <1013642064.24926.8.camel@notebook> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 14 Feb 2002 01:14:44 +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --=-MnXBtXazZ8H2eRegxm5G Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 22:56, Ade Lovett wrote: > On 02/13/02 14:34, "Joe Clarke" wrote: >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Ade Lovett wrote: > >=20 > >> On 02/13/02 14:23, "Ade Lovett" wrote: > >>> That's taken care of with Jeremy's patches to my patches. Give me 10= -15 > >>> minutes to do some testing, and I'll roll up another set. > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> Ok. Updated. Same place as before: > >>=20 > >> http://www.lovett.com/~ade/gnome/screensaver.tar.gz > >>=20 > >> Make sure you have this one: > >>=20 > >> MD5 (screensaver.tar.gz) =3D e67ed030ab759c6741d6001dbecdad3f > >=20 > > I have the write file, but WANT_GNOME still equals YES in the slave por= t. >=20 > Bah! Suppose it helps if I put the right files in place :) >=20 > MD5 (screensaver.tar.gz) =3D 66829b3e8127293229d64c555a1aecf5 gnomecc and gnome parts look fine to me. I've merged some changes from your version of xscreensaver patch into my earlier version of the patch and committed it. Apart from being much more compact my patch is better because it doesn't require %%CONFIGDIR%% in pkg-plist. IMO there is absolutely no reason why config files should be placed into different subdirs in GNOME/noGNOME case - this only adds headache to the maintainer. -Maxim --=-MnXBtXazZ8H2eRegxm5G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8avNPoNu5t4iCBa8RAs7jAJ0UGWGjaawY9znYksrKbyFsQ/o31wCaA2w9 TC/RO00MBPuEtcbXLLlvXZg= =dDAc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MnXBtXazZ8H2eRegxm5G-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message