From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Sep 13 14:28:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA00773
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 13 Sep 1997 14:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA00765
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 1997 14:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA04838;
	Sat, 13 Sep 1997 22:34:45 +0200 (CEST)
To: Daniel Ortmann <ortmann@sparc.isl.net>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Does this idea have merit? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Sep 1997 12:39:47 CDT."
             <199709131739.MAA00426@watcher.isl.net> 
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 22:34:44 +0200
Message-ID: <4836.874182884@critter.freebsd.dk>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199709131739.MAA00426@watcher.isl.net>, Daniel Ortmann writes:

>On the other hand, maybe I'm missing something basic.  Is there
>some other way to find out (without forking a /bin/ps):

cat /proc/*/status | grep ... ?

Extending the tree in procfs is not for the faint ...

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."