From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Nov 13 13: 4:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E11637B479 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 13:04:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eADL4JR08211; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:04:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA34543; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:04:19 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200011132104.OAA34543@harmony.village.org> To: Gregory Bond Subject: Re: Multiport NIC needed Cc: Boris Samorodov , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:15:03 +1100." <200011130315.OAA05511@lightning.itga.com.au> References: <200011130315.OAA05511@lightning.itga.com.au> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:04:19 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200011130315.OAA05511@lightning.itga.com.au> Gregory Bond writes: : We have used the Intel twin fxp card since 3.2 with no problems. We've used the twin fxp cards since 3.2 as well. We've also used a tulip based de bard that was horrible. Mostly because the older tulips don't like some of the hubs that we've used. We have a newer tulip dc based quad board that works great on 3.x and 4.x. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message