From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jun 11 6:43:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 749BB37B405 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 06:43:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg) Received: (qmail 59904 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Jun 2001 13:42:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:42:01 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opinion on port removal Message-ID: <20010611164201.A59082@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." , ports@freebsd.org References: <20010611083834.E28641@leviathan.inethouston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010611083834.E28641@leviathan.inethouston.net>; from dwcjr@inethouston.net on Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 08:38:34AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 08:38:34AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > Does anyone have an opinion on ports/28033? As the maintainer explained, JPDA is already a part of JDK 1.3, so I removed it. If anybody has used JPDA independently of the bugseeker port, then I apologize, and I shall resurrect it. G'luck, Peter -- The rest of this sentence is written in Thailand, on To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message