From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Nov 13 14:10: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E2337B4C5 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id OAA91318; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:10:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:10:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200011132210.OAA91318@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: EAB Teuling Subject: Re: kern/22723: panic in socket operation inside jails Reply-To: EAB Teuling Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/22723; it has been noted by GNATS. From: EAB Teuling To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net Cc: Subject: Re: kern/22723: panic in socket operation inside jails Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 22:59:57 +0100 I had the same problem with my kernel, but I ran an ktrace over inetd when it was starting, and the last operation attempted was a socket call to open a IPv6 socket, which is not a supported protocol on my box (neither on yours if I see it correctly). The EPROTONOSUPPORT seemed like a perfectly good reply to me. I'm all in favour for moving the prp == 0 check up, because not having protocol installed is what seems to cause the panic. Ernst Teuling To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message