From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Feb 27 00:35:36 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE4D5553F2 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 00:35:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DnSHD2gHbz3PW3; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 00:35:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4864QBhLndq+OnFsPGmkaI97J4nDQ+rQWPoGRa+fq0k=; b=rtir2U3azDFK5ixDa/v8wtLu9I 4VLzidQCTYai2ax3+8aSc+Ti13yGGyZHq7+mjN/y2CCMsgPTElfVYMRr1SEVr1EcgE69vjrLFV/Ag JBA4r/gkQDL7vi6mrmyU71EwyD/+pWxUQTFOIdDNUY+dwLSokCzFU5PE3VoByeDp61LI=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lFna2-001Khk-0i; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:35:34 -0700 Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.69]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1lFnZz-0006Us-6C; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:35:33 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9E912815B2; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:35:31 -0700 (MST) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta5.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta5.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id rdgcP3aZa9Bt; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:35:30 -0700 (MST) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC97412808F0; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:35:30 -0700 (MST) To: Ryan Moeller , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: From: Rebecca Cran Message-ID: <677e7417-0e0c-b791-e4c9-e0e8a2082e5e@bsdio.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:35:29 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-XM-SPF: eid=1lFnZz-0006Us-6C; ; ; mid=<677e7417-0e0c-b791-e4c9-e0e8a2082e5e@bsdio.com>; ; ; hst=in01.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.69; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,NICE_REPLY_A,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,TooManyTo_001, XMSubLong,XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4999] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ; Ryan Moeller , freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1885 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.10 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (0.6%), b_tie_ro: 10 (0.5%), parse: 1.09 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 5 (0.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.37 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.7 (0.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.32 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 1.14 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 1612 (85.5%), check_bayes: 1610 (85.4%), b_tokenize: 8 (0.4%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (0.4%), b_comp_prob: 2.2 (0.1%), b_tok_touch_all: 1589 (84.3%), b_finish: 1.06 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 240 (12.7%), check_dkim_signature: 0.63 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 40 (2.1%), poll_dns_idle: 32 (1.7%), tests_pri_10: 2.3 (0.1%), tests_pri_500: 7 (0.4%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: zfs: zpool status says I have unactivated features, but upgrade says I don't X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DnSHD2gHbz3PW3 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 00:35:36 -0000 On 2/26/2021 4:25 PM, Ryan Moeller wrote: > On 2/26/21 5:14 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote: >> I'm seeing a mismatch on 14-CURRENT between 'zpool status' saying I >> have features that aren't enabled, and 'zpool upgrade' which says I >> don't. >> >> [bcran@smic ~]$ zpool status >>   pool: spool >>  state: ONLINE >> status: Some supported and requested features are not enabled on the >> pool. >>         The pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable. >> action: Enable all features using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, >>         the pool may no longer be accessible by software that does >> not support >>         the features. See zpool-features(5) for details. >>   scan: scrub repaired 0B in 01:20:51 with 0 errors on Thu Feb 11 >> 16:48:07 2021 >> config: >> >>         NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM >>         spool       ONLINE       0     0     0 >>           mirror-0  ONLINE       0     0     0 >>             ada0p2  ONLINE       0     0     0 >>             ada1p2  ONLINE       0     0     0 >>             ada2p2  ONLINE       0     0     0 >>             ada3p2  ONLINE       0     0     0 >>           mirror-1  ONLINE       0     0     0 >>             ada4p2  ONLINE       0     0     0 >>             ada5p2  ONLINE       0     0     0 >>             ada6p2  ONLINE       0     0     0 >>             ada7p2  ONLINE       0     0     0 >> >> errors: No known data errors >> >> [bcran@smic ~]$ sudo zpool upgrade spool >> This system supports ZFS pool feature flags. >> >> Pool 'spool' already has all supported and requested features enabled. > > > Should be fixed now, see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28935 Great - thanks! -- Rebecca Cran