From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 21 15:44:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E378016A5B5; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:44:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCAE43D46; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:44:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8LFiDcK059814; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:44:13 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k8LFiDdQ059813; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:44:13 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:44:12 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Mikhail Teterin Message-ID: <20060921154412.GA59729@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Mikhail Teterin , current@FreeBSD.ORG, Paul Eggert , tjr@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200609202304.25537@aldan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200609202304.25537@aldan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Paul Eggert , current@FreeBSD.ORG, tjr@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: replacing FreeBSD's -lgnuregex with GNUlib's version X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:44:31 -0000 On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:04:24PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > A recent discussion on the gm4 and gnulib mailing lists over the merits of > gm4's bundling of its own regex implementation has produced the suggestion, > that we replace our src/gnu/lib/libregex (which is currently obtained from > fedora-glibc-2_3_4-21) with gnulib's implementation. > > The latter is claimed to be more actively maintained and with more bug fixes, > than glibc people have managed to incorporate. > > Does anyone have a strong preference for fedora/glibc implementation currently > in use, or should we follow this advice (source -- regex' maintainer for > gnulib -- CC-ed) and switch over? Please point to gnulib's regex sources to compare with. -- http://ache.pp.ru/