From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu May 18 06:28:34 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA08094
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 06:28:34 -0700
Received: from wc.cdrom.com (wc.cdrom.com [192.216.223.37])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA08088
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 May 1995 06:28:33 -0700
Received: from prinny.pavilion.co.uk (prinny.pavilion.co.uk [193.131.160.34])
          by wc.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id GAA22170
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 May 1995 06:28:36 -0700
Received: from line07.gunn-du.pavilion.co.uk (line07.gunn-du.pavilion.co.uk [193.131.160.104]) by prinny.pavilion.co.uk (8.6.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id OAA16715 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 May 1995 14:27:47 +0100
Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 14:27:47 +0100
Message-Id: <199505181327.OAA16715@prinny.pavilion.co.uk>
X-Sender: aledm@mailhost.pavilion.co.uk (Unverified)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
From: aledm@pavilion.co.uk (Aled Morris)
Subject: ram-speed (was Re: Adaptec 2940?)
X-Mailer: <PC Eudora Version 1.4>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> wrote:
[ram-speed program and results]

FWIW here's the output from my Gateway 2000 Colorbook (notebook) DX4-75
with 12Mb RAM, FreeBSD 2.0R:

$ ./ram-speed > out
$ cat out
49005fb0   0.355 uS/op 2.82e+06 op/S 10.752 Mb/S
8938c0df   0.156 uS/op 6.42e+06 op/S 24.490 Mb/S

pretty good I think.  I've always wondered about the kinds of design
compromises that go into notebooks - looks like memory bandwidth is
OK.

Aled
--
telephone +44 973 207987