Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 20:00:41 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@freebsd.org>, fcp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP 20190401-ci_policy: CI policy Message-ID: <CAPyFy2CpfLp4wZz98aHeN9aC9S8aCmp4m8O0MYxwyzd_Jbi4FQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20190829153712.GB71821@kib.kiev.ua> References: <CAKBkRUwKKPKwRvUs00ja0%2BG9vCBB1pKhv6zBS-F-hb=pqMzSxQ@mail.gmail.com> <20190829114057.GZ71821@kib.kiev.ua> <412537DD-D98F-4B92-85F5-CB93CF33F281@FreeBSD.org> <20190829144228.GA71821@kib.kiev.ua> <B8B361D5-A41E-4A40-91CC-A7E170457257@FreeBSD.org> <20190829153712.GB71821@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 11:37, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > > I fully agree with your attitude there, and understand your frustration. > IMO the right action would be to contact the committers who did the > relevant changes, first. Was it done ? What was their response ? If we had tests running consistently at the time an offending change was introduced we might know that :) This is exactly the reason I want us to have a large corpus of tests that are, as a rule, expected to consistently pass. As far as I can tell from a cursory investigation this is a flaw that predates the pf tests, and just happens to be demonstrated by them.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2CpfLp4wZz98aHeN9aC9S8aCmp4m8O0MYxwyzd_Jbi4FQ>