From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jul  5 18:04:55 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA14471
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 18:04:55 -0700
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA14463
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 18:04:54 -0700
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <14719(6)>; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 18:04:15 PDT
Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <49860>; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 18:04:04 -0700
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.1 5/23/95
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: another reason not to change 0.0.0.0 into 192.0.0.1 in PPP 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Jul 95 17:16:40 PDT."
             <95Jul5.171656pdt.49860@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 1995 18:03:46 PDT
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <95Jul5.180404pdt.49860@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199507050326.VAA22797@rover.village.org> Warner wrote:
>I think that the original intent was to use 192.2.0.1, which is
>officially a test network and someone got confused :-).

Whoops, Warner was *almost* right -- it's 192.0.2.x which is the test network. 
 192.0.0.x is just reserved.

But given that this discussion is irrelevant anyway, ...

  Bill