Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 14:55:30 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: bakul@netcom.com, terry@lambert.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org, hsu@cs.hut.fi Subject: Re: Policy on printf format specifiers? Message-ID: <199509200455.OAA10868@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I don't really care whether I have to add additional unsigned short based >functions or not, though using wchar_t as a 16 bit unsigned value would >save a lot of code duplication and kernel bloat. You have to add additional u_int16_t based functions to support externally imposed 16-bit storage formats, and u_int32_t based functions to support 32-bit storage formats (not to mention u_int36_t based functions to support 36-bit storage formats :-). Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509200455.OAA10868>