From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 16 22:40:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 0A7C41065672; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:40:11 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Benjamin Kaduk Message-ID: <20110816224010.GA84231@freebsd.org> References: <201107262349.p6QNnKTa060909@red.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/159220: Strange sentence in /usr/src/UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:40:11 -0000 On Tue Jul 26 11, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Alexander Best wrote: > > > > >>Number: 159220 > >>Category: docs > >>Synopsis: Strange sentence in /usr/src/UPDATING > >>Confidential: no > >>Severity: non-critical > >>Priority: low > >>Responsible: freebsd-doc > >>State: open > >>Quarter: > >>Keywords: > >>Date-Required: > >>Class: doc-bug > >>Submitter-Id: current-users > >>Arrival-Date: Tue Jul 26 23:50:04 UTC 2011 > >>Closed-Date: > >>Last-Modified: > >>Originator: Alexander Best > >>Release: 9.0-CURRENT > >>Organization: > >>Environment: > >FreeBSD otaku 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r224294=bc9530b-dirty: > >Sun Jul 24 23:47:48 CEST 2011 > >arundel@otaku:/usr/obj/usr/git-freebsd-head/sys/ARUNDEL amd64 > >>Description: > >In /usr/src/UPDATING, almost at the very end of the file, there's the > >following sentence: > > > >"This file contains a list, in reverse chronological order, of major > >breakages in tracking -current. Not all things will be listed here, > >and it only starts on October 16, 2004. Updating files can found in > >previous releases if your system is older than this." > > > >The last sentence seems quite broken. At least I haven't got a clue what > >it's supposed to mean. > > "If you need to see entries from the UPDATING file which are older than > 2004/10/16, go get the UPDATING file from a previous &os; release, and it > will have a better chance of including what you're looking for." could we please please please get this fixed before 9.0? > > -Ben Kaduk