From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 7 08:49:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7603B16A419; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 08:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394E613C45A; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 08:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF61420BA; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 10:48:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B78320AE; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 10:48:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 245FB844A8; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 10:48:50 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Darren Reed References: <4707569E.6010400@freebsd.org> <868x6gpk3i.fsf@ds4.des.no> <47083883.6000503@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 10:48:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <47083883.6000503@freebsd.org> (Darren Reed's message of "Sat\, 06 Oct 2007 18\:38\:11 -0700") Message-ID: <863awn9uoe.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Current , pjd@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ZFS & NFS integration... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 08:49:00 -0000 Darren Reed writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > > Darren Reed writes: > > > Whats the planned status for ZFS+NFS with 7.0? > > Don't Do It, basically. > This sounds like a "shoot yourself in the foot" comment. > > Why? I haven't figured out the exact details yet, but apparently when the client closes a file that was opened read / write, the server stops responding to that client. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no