From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 20 23:16:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4440106566B; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 23:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ray@ddteam.net) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335BA8FC14; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 23:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so5943946fxm.13 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.55.12 with SMTP id s12mr4082376fag.124.1300662966991; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rnote.ddteam.net (28-115-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net [95.133.115.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c21sm1980389fac.22.2011.03.20.16.16.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 01:16:01 +0200 From: Aleksandr Rybalko To: Adrian Chadd Message-Id: <20110321011601.6e72f00f.ray@ddteam.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20110314162936.d3f8fd5b.ray@dlink.ua> <20110320222859.4cf96caf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Aleksandr Rybalko , "Sergey V. Dyatko" , freebsd-mips@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFR]RT305xF support, w/o attachment X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 23:16:09 -0000 On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 05:59:45 +0800 Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 21 March 2011 04:28, Sergey V. Dyatko > wrote: > > > > Last patch from Aleksandr 'works fine for me', so... may be rt2860 > > should be replaced to 'rt' for example ? > > rt0: flags= blah-blah-blah IHMO looks more .....nice(?) than > > rt28600: flags= > > > > Yup, that's a good idea. Aleksandr, can you please do that? Off-course I can, but seems better name will be rtw or rtn, because we already have if_rt (for RT3052 ether) which have iface name "rt". I think "rtn" is best. Maybe someone have better? > > > Adrian -- Aleksandr Rybalko