From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 19 18:27:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA17477 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 18:27:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp4.nwnexus.com (smtp4.nwnexus.com [206.63.63.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA17469 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 18:27:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wrsomsky@halcyon.com) Received: from gramarye (evt-lx101-ip17.nwnexus.net [204.57.235.67]) by smtp4.nwnexus.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA09563; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 18:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from wrsomsky@localhost) by gramarye (8.9.1/8.8.8) id SAA01163; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 18:22:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wrsomsky) Message-ID: <19981019182252.A1153@halcyon.com> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 18:22:52 -0700 From: "William R. Somsky" To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Andrew Maltsev Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -stable to 3.0 transition References: <199810190836.MAA01535@amsoft.ru> <3716.908787025@time.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <3716.908787025@time.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Mon, Oct 19, 1998 at 01:50:25AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 19, 1998 at 01:50:25AM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Btw, will 3.0-stable branch be forked? > > After some of the dust finishes settling and 3.0 is more worthy of the > title. Maybe January. Would it be useful to establish the "RELENG_3_0" cvs tag now, even if it doesn't actually diverge from "." until January? Or is there something that would prevent this from doing/being the "right thing"? ________________________________________________________________________ William R. Somsky wrsomsky@halcyon.com Physicist, Baritone, Guitarist http://www.halcyon.com/wrsomsky To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message