From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jun 8 12:42:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from privatecube.privatelabs.com (privatecube.privatelabs.com [198.143.31.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF5F37B7EC for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 12:42:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi@privatelabs.com) Received: from misha.privatelabs.com (root@misha.privatelabs.com [198.143.31.6]) by privatecube.privatelabs.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA04423; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:41:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from privatelabs.com (mi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by misha.privatelabs.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00971; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 15:40:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@privatelabs.com) From: mi@privatelabs.com Message-Id: <200006081940.PAA00971@misha.privatelabs.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 15:40:41 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: changes in dd? To: Gerhard Sittig Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20000608194615.N9883@speedy.gsinet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 8 Jun, Gerhard Sittig wrote: = On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 17:08 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: = > = > My command line is: = > ssh -o'Compression no' -e none -c blowfish \ = > dd ibs=1 count= of=/dev/null < /kernel.GENERIC = = Look at what you do here: You shuffle *many* tiny packets around each = of them being *one* byte long. This will result in a _very_ tight loop = eating time without any making sense. I understand, but why am I seeing different behavior on different machines? Why does not April 19 -stable care and still shows the same speed, but the June 2 -stable cares and demostrates terrible performance drop? = How about doing this with _one_ block of the size you want? I.e. what = stops you from swapping the count and bs parameters? That's a good idea, thanks! How come I did not think of it myself :) ? Of course, now I already wrote my own program :( ... Yours, -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message