From owner-freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Wed Feb 20 15:31:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC23214F6CB7 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F3B855D9 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 209CC14F6CB6; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: multimedia@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C88414F6CB5 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay114.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay114.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34279855D3; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BGAAAhcm1c/99MQFdkGwEBAQEDAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BBwMBAQGBUwQBAQELAQGCAlYRUSASFBONAIsKAQGCDDUBiXCNdhSBZyUNhEc?= =?us-ascii?q?Cg3MjNgcNAQMBAQIBAQJtHAxCARABhHcBAQEDATkcIxALDgoJJQ8ZER4GE4M?= =?us-ascii?q?hgXYLrmWELwGEeIEOjFuBf4Qjgx4DAoFHhXcCijaGYZI1CYc8g2+CfoQlJYJ?= =?us-ascii?q?IkD6DJYxvjiwDLoFWTTAISBWCSgmLFYVAPgMwAYUmimQBAQ?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BGAAAhcm1c/99MQFdkGwEBAQEDAQEBBwMBAQGBUwQBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QELAQGCAlYRUSASFBONAIsKAQGCDDUBiXCNdhSBZyUNhEcCg3MjNgcNAQMBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QIBAQJtHAxCARABhHcBAQEDATkcIxALDgoJJQ8ZER4GE4MhgXYLrmWELwGEe?= =?us-ascii?q?IEOjFuBf4Qjgx4DAoFHhXcCijaGYZI1CYc8g2+CfoQlJYJIkD6DJYxvjiwDL?= =?us-ascii?q?oFWTTAISBWCSgmLFYVAPgMwAYUmimQBAQ?= Received: from 223.76-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([87.64.76.223]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2019 16:30:33 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1KFUWqh042246; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:30:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:30:31 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: Jan Beich , multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: drop multimedia@ maintainership on some ports Message-ID: <20190220163031.401cac00@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20190220141225.fskioqhkght6uq5n@ivaldir.net> References: <20190220113842.neue3nmigxfcqul3@ivaldir.net> <20190220134434.7d5oxoi4jfvgxwqw@ivaldir.net> <20190220141225.fskioqhkght6uq5n@ivaldir.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 34279855D3 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.968,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:31:47 -0000 On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:12:25 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 01:31:11PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote: >>> Baptiste Daroussin writes: >>>> I am planning to drop maintainership of some ports actually maintained by >>>> multimedia@ to ports@ in order to give a chance to anyone to jump on it and >>>> maintain them directly if needed. >>> >>> Hmm, I had the opposite reaction from another portmgr@ peer. >>> >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/2018-October/189060.html >> >> Interesting I bet we do need to have a portmgr discussion here. > > After discussing with mat we are actually aligned, what mat is describing there > is the default policy for when we do reset maintainership, as it will start > becoming complicated if there was specific policy. But then the team itself can > decide on the fact to actually maintain those or not. Can you review gnome@ ports as well while you're at it? :) They maintain over 500 ports many of which aren't gnome related and almost half are out of date according to portscout.freebsd.org.