From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 00:43:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3013216A420 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:43:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@knobbe.us) Received: from mail.praemunio.com (mail.praemunio.com [66.179.47.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A54243D46 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:43:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@knobbe.us) Received: from localhost (HELO mail.knobbe.us) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Oct 2005 19:43:24 -0500 Received: from localhost by localhost with SMTP; 16 Oct 2005 19:43:23 -0500 From: Frank Knobbe To: "Andrew P." In-Reply-To: References: <007e01c5d243$77839100$6501a8c0@GRANT> <008501c5d24b$80bff0d0$6501a8c0@GRANT> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dH3eVSEXvWv+gWvNsfd+" Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:43:22 -0500 Message-Id: <1129509802.7548.17.camel@server1> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: Grant Peel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote Console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:43:27 -0000 --=-dH3eVSEXvWv+gWvNsfd+ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 16:44 +0400, Andrew P. wrote: > I would not support your chaining idea, though.[...] >=20 > The matter is, that you'll want 9600 bps speeds > for max compatibility. While it is usable for > occasional failure recovery, chaining it would > make it lag too much. Well, chaining is such a strong word. How about "connecting the serial ports in a ring"? The thing is that he only jumps from one box to the other, not through more/all of them.=20 I actually prefer this solution over a portmaster, unless it supports SSH. I would hate to telnet with a clear-text password across the Internet. SSH'ing into a live system, and them calling upon the other system via serial port seems like a good solution to me. Cheers, Frank --=-dH3eVSEXvWv+gWvNsfd+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDUvOqwBQKb2zelzoRAu87AJ0ZL5rlamtIkqvfRBwBAizqJ6UgrgCgqT+o tJ/0JuRIWlFtnTh6lzUcyIg= =xY96 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dH3eVSEXvWv+gWvNsfd+--