Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:39:53 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: New VOP to translate vnode to its component name Message-ID: <20081207193953.GJ27096@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <1228670197.69753.24.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <1228667168.69753.16.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20081207170354.GI18652@hoeg.nl> <1228670197.69753.24.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> [081207 09:17] wrote: > On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 18:03 +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: > > Hello Joe, > > > > * Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > Here is a patch to HEAD, along with a man page, for VOP_CNP. > > > > Maybe this should be called VOP_COMPONENTNAME? I know, it's not as short > > as VOP_CNP, but is probably less cryptic to people who are trying to > > figure out how the VFS works. > > I'm open to a new name, but VOP_COMPONENTNAME does seem a bit unwieldy. > What about VOP_VPTONAME (in the same vein as VOP_VPTOFH)? either VOP_VPTONAME or VOP_VPTOCNP (this is cool) -Alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081207193953.GJ27096>