From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 9 12:10:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52930106564A; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk1.360sip.com [72.236.70.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25518FC0C; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.38] (S0106005004e13421.vs.shawcable.net [70.71.175.212]) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o29C9uZx008204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Mar 2010 04:09:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4B963A97.4040308@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:09:59 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <58991.1268134136@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <58991.1268134136@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r204909 - head/sbin/newfs X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:10:00 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <201003091031.o29AV3JO088200@svn.freebsd.org>, Maxim Sobolev writes: > >> Log: >> Change secrorsize back to int, since that's the data type expected by the >> ioctl(DIOCGSECTORSIZE). It creates issues on some architectures. > > Uhm, no, DIOCGSECTORSIZE requires an u_int: > > $ grep DIOCGSECTORSIZE /sys/sys/disk.h > #define DIOCGSECTORSIZE _IOR('d', 128, u_int) Heh, so it was a bug in the original code prior to my initial change. However, I guess it's not a big issue anyway since media with sector size larger that 2GiB hardly makes any sense today. Maybe in 100 years from now this will be regular sector size, but by then we will probably have 1024-bit wide ints anyway. :) -Maxim