From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 25 10:30:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D92916A4CE for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44BE43D45 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:30:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1PIU0OJ026381; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:30:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i1PITxTQ026380; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:29:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:29:59 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Jem Matzan Message-ID: <20040225182959.GF7567@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <1077658664.92943.15.camel@.rochester.rr.com> <20040224215847.GC6356@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <403BCA6B.2050908@thejemreport.com> <200402241736.55911.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <403BD508.7080307@thejemreport.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <403BD508.7080307@thejemreport.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: "'freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: Re: Performance comparison, ULE vs 4BSD and AMD64 vs i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:30:01 -0000 On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 05:49:44PM -0500, Jem Matzan wrote: > Ah -- I wasn't considering all of the possibilities. It was the AMD64 > form i386 crossbuild that wasn't working for me (while actually trying > to turn a working i386 system into an AMD64 build -- it was the > installworld that failed and broke everything to hell. Now I remember). That is a TOTALLY different thing. Cross building works fine, installing the cross built bits on a 2nd machine is reported to work. Doing an in-place migration from 32-bit to 64-bit on an AMD64 isn't at all supported [at this time].