Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:08:25 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/portupgrade Makefile ports/sysutils/portupgrade/files patch-portinfo.rb Message-ID: <20040621230825.GA3664@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200406220048.06263.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <200406211738.i5LHcnYk075412@repoman.freebsd.org> <200406220048.06263.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:47:59AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Monday 21 June 2004 19:38, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > > knu 2004-06-21 17:38:49 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > sysutils/portupgrade Makefile > > Added files: > > sysutils/portupgrade/files patch-portinfo.rb > > Log: > > Support the new, extended INDEX format. >=20 > This completely breaks portupgrade for me... is the new INDEX format stuf= f=20 > committed yet at all? No, I'm waiting to hear from DES about how it will affect porteasy. Kris --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA12ppWry0BWjoQKURArXiAJ44UZZd4toyLqkw1lC0jzi1OuceNQCcDb9o Z8w9b/TE0HCpbMhvfCPEf18= =5145 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040621230825.GA3664>