From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jul 10 15:25:27 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA02163
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 15:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phoenix.its.rpi.edu (dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu [128.113.161.45])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA02158
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 15:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dec@localhost)
	by phoenix.its.rpi.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA20751
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 18:25:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 18:25:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: "David E. Cross" <dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: 2.2-RELENG vs. 2.2.2-RELEASE
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970710182405.20702A-100000@phoenix.its.rpi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I asked in -questions and #freebsd but got no answer.  Thought I would try
here.

Can 2.2-RELENG be assumed as stable as 2.2.2-RELEASE.

(I am looking to upgrade from 2.2.1-RELEASE mostly to get rid of the libXt
security holes.)

--
David Cross