From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 1 20:24:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA08468 for current-outgoing; Thu, 1 May 1997 20:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (whizzo.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA08463 for ; Thu, 1 May 1997 20:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.transsys.com (localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1]) by whizzo.transsys.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA09983; Thu, 1 May 1997 23:23:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199705020323.XAA09983@whizzo.transsys.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV cc: proff@suburbia.net, syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au (Stephen McKay), freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: "Louis A. Mamakos" Subject: Re: latest -current upgrade and CFS References: <199705011444.HAA16684@bach.ca.sandia.gov> In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 01 May 1997 07:44:04 PDT." <199705011444.HAA16684@bach.ca.sandia.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 23:23:27 -0400 Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > This is probably a stupid question, but it seems to me that if you take out > all the crypto parts of CFS, all that's left is a framework that takes > filesystem data, runs it through a transform, and makes it available to the > filesystem at a different mountpoint. Why is that forbidden? > > (Slap me upside the head if this is straying too far from -current topics.) > Yeah, I thought it would be neat to take this part of CFS and a bit of SAMBA so that you could mount a remote Win95 or NT file system using SMB. louie