From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 12 19:33:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91FD5E7 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dieterbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x241.google.com (mail-ie0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948451D06 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f193.google.com with SMTP id s9so2965825iec.0 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:33:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UpoVG02InOy9kZbG+fYfCilx6D5auDSVDyaKh2AUPkI=; b=kPuycVQX4CwURidkKjEmiHq3FRZb3kAlY03QXbbG898Uto4MBzPaT0EMPsNDlf9R1U AK2aT+mZtjxHp/Di6jUtski2OjAF/BvFNAgmSsDdNQrDU8CV+lxdNdYztRK8bVT/snT1 IPtq5612UP5+oZzEsSn4glkD2VSElh5/8bXmWjm6CAYeWJnoi19quV73yZlBkFX9lRTP 13hDSmOESPUc2wXnSrP7Hx+/NLcS0MwscvXINHpHLeoIcrXZhOg1d/1TQMrdSKyAR+lv rwWKWXVEgDI2/RaY/m2QgV6Tn46xqGnxjqls4Kr+OLQEc0WgxvbxikhmZZ7QuFhsVBCz ivnw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.23.108 with SMTP id l12mr4063818igf.45.1371065585296; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.139.34 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:33:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FFS: fsck doesn't match doc From: Dieter BSD To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:33:05 -0000 >> Would it be safe to have fsck automagically fix this problem, as the >> doc (incorrectly) says it does? > > What happens if you add to /etc/rc.conf: > > fsck_y_enable="YES" > background_fsck="NO" Fsck -y is not safe. :-( Would it be *safe* to have "fsck -p" automagically fix this problem, as the doc (incorrectly) says it does?