Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:08:21 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: AN <andy@neu.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 9-current packages Message-ID: <20091209010820.GB9360@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <4B1EF636.5050005@FreeBSD.org> References: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0912081909350.73484@neu.net> <4B1EF636.5050005@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 04:58:30PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > In developing the package code for portmaster I used the 8-current > packages with good result (and in fact coded that into the script for > now). However as time goes on and more things change between 8-stable > and 9-current that workaround will no longer be appropriate. We're quite aware of this. We can either get more amd64 horsepower (and I am pushing the issue as hard as I can; I've just brought another machine back up with some debug code to catch the problems we saw last time we ran it), or drop amd64-6 builds. There are a finite number of cycles available. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091209010820.GB9360>