From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 10 23:40:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E35106564A for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F348FC15 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-1-225.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.1.225]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FBF1DB34; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:40:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n7ANeARi004242; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:40:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:40:09 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Jeff Laine Message-Id: <20090811014009.46a70aee.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20090810225508.GA36580@free.bsd.loc> References: <20090731085553.461f73be.cyb.@gmx.net> <20090731114711.49d94196.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090731170422.0574fef5.cyb.@gmx.net> <20090731221532.ab004d5b.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090731205636.GB44613@kokopelli.hydra> <20090731231007.feec5a75.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090807061137.GA4290@kokopelli.hydra> <4A7C1AD3.5060503@rcn.com> <20090810225508.GA36580@free.bsd.loc> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Daniel Underwood , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for fast graphical web browser X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:40:13 -0000 On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:55:08 +0400, Jeff Laine wrote: > But now I'm pretty happy with that new firefox-3.5 which seems pretty > faster than previous version and still light enough for my old 1.6G > celeron-powered laptop. May I guess what I should consider light enough for my uber-old ancient 0.5G AMD powered laptop? :-) By the way: In order to find out which browser is *really* lightweight, fast and still easy to use, responsive and standard compliant, you should try running it on *really* old hardware. If it runs there good enough so you would use it, it will be blazing fast on your modern hardware of today. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...