From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 24 13: 6:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nottingham.ac.uk (jess.ccc.nottingham.ac.uk [128.243.40.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B22637BD31 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:06:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from psyrawt@nottingham.ac.uk) Received: from legalex.demon.co.uk ([212.229.180.134] helo=dreadnaught) by nottingham.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #2) id 13GoUX-0003Ks-00; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 21:06:21 +0100 From: "Andrew Tulloch" To: "Edward Wolpert" Cc: Subject: RE: USB ports on FreeBSD 4.1-RC Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 21:03:05 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've seen similar messages since cvsup'ing the other day, although my usb seems to still work fine with my MS intellieye mouse being detected and functioning as before... > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Edward Wolpert > Sent: 24 July 2000 13:26 > To: stable@freebsd.org > Subject: USB ports on FreeBSD 4.1-RC > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Folks- > > I did a clean rebuild Sunday (July 23) morning MST, and > everything seems to > work great. However, I just noticed in the dmesg that my USB hub didn't > come up as it usually does. Here's the specifics from dmesg... > > uhci0: port > 0xfcc0-0xfcdf irq 9 at dev > ice 7.2 on pci0 > usb0: on uhci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhub0: port 1 power on failed, IOERROR > uhub0: port 2 power on failed, IOERROR > ugen0: Connectix Corp. QuickCam, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2 > > (I don't use it, so I wasn't looking for it.) The lines saying > that port 1 > and port 2 power on failed are new, compared to 4.0-stable of > about Jun 17. > It did find the quickcam, so I don't know if the messages are meaningful. > > > Virtually, | Open/Web Systems Architect > Edward Wolpert | > 4eb8 4e75 | "Java. It's not just for > ___________________________________________/ breakfast anymore. " -anon > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: 2.6.2 > > iQB1AwUBOXw1y62tQW/xJRRFAQGC2gMAtyZ+pGZZOGRL4VOAiApsr4c9aOzGpfdd > cIBjC/4NHqxdr6EB3q1vqlakJ4LYWw/zm9Xq9HBBXZJKD+kJrCTOc0EMR/YSyLkM > 4SJqdAIiH73l7+Rp18IXUQZvjdHYgadW > =RSFR > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message