From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 12:21:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0A616A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:21:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60CB43D49 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:21:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i09KLXZV029755; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:21:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)i09KLWMs029752; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:21:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:21:32 -0500 (EST) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: Christian Brueffer In-Reply-To: <20040109193008.GA76206@unixpages.org> Message-ID: <20040109151814.X19622@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> References: <20040104233747.V9356@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> <20040109193008.GA76206@unixpages.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sbp(4) on 4-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:21:36 -0000 On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Christian Brueffer wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:40:29PM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > > The sbp(4) manpage says the following: > > > > SYNOPSIS > > kldload firewire > > kldload cam > > kldload sbp > > > > I have not been able to find any modules for the cam subsystem on RELENG_4 > > (It's present on HEAD). Shouldn't this entry be removed for the 4.x > > branch? > > You're right. The sbp module is also missing. I'll have a talk with > simokawa, so either the lines geht removed or the modules will be > provided. SBP can currently be compiled statically into the kernel. I think that the module either needs to be connected to the build tree on 4.x-STABLE or that the possibility of compiling it into the kernel be documented. > Thanks for the report. Very welcome. Regards, > Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > > Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >