From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 18 18:04:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE73E106566B; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1828FC0C; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) by mx5.roble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD7E68037; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:04:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:04:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Tilman_Keskin=F6z?= In-Reply-To: <4E2402CD.9090605@FreeBSD.org> References: <201107171633.p6HGXLXq061005@freefall.freebsd.org> <20110717220721.521DF106566B@hub.freebsd.org> <4E2402CD.9090605@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <20110718180455.BE73E106566B@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/158982: [MAINTAINER] www/tinyproxy: update to 1.8.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:04:55 -0000 > Please provide build log what is failing. And what are the differences. Is this normally required of port maintainers wishing to submit a simple one line patch? If so I have underestimated the effort required to be a port maintainer. Since I do not have time to create build logs for every system use the port on please go ahead and remove my name from the maintainer list. Would also help to know what the point of this level justification is? Are there any examples of a system where either patch breaks the build process? If not could you point me to where on the FreeBSD website it explains the conditions under which patches will and will not be accepted? The patches are both obvious enough. They work around bugs in the source code and/or the ascidoc package. Roger Marquis