From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 14 13:37:58 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD27616A46E for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yousif@alumni.jmu.edu) Received: from coruscant.far-far-away.us (coruscant.far-far-away.us [70.91.196.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 508A913C457 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yousif@alumni.jmu.edu) Received: (qmail 76438 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2007 09:33:24 -0400 Received: from pknat1.passkey.com (HELO ?192.168.16.174?) (68.162.198.134) by coruscant.far-far-away.us with SMTP; 14 Sep 2007 09:33:24 -0400 From: Yousif Hassan To: Robert Noland In-Reply-To: <1189721265.13714.12.camel@rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com> References: <1189718884.1358.55.camel@localhost> <1189721265.13714.12.camel@rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:38:13 -0400 Message-Id: <1189777093.10875.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new emerald in ports (0.5.2) + beryl = problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yousif@alumni.jmu.edu List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:37:58 -0000 > The beryl port will not move, in fact it will go away very soon. You > need to be moving to compiz. All of the relevant parts are in the tree > now. The 0.6.0 version of compiz-fusion is due any day now. This is as I expected, and good news. Are the KDE components in there now, or are those due in 0.6.0? I see that ccsm is in ports -- that's great! > heliodor is in ports, aquamarine is not. emerald is only a dependency > of the metaport. There are versions of aquamarine ports out there that can be used since there isn't one officially checked in. I'm using one and it does work flawlessly. If anyone's interested, a quick search of the x11 mailing list archives will return some links. Thanks, everyone, for your responses. --y