Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:46:41 -0800 From: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: First vm_zone patch Message-ID: <20010120194641.Q69199@canonware.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpk87ph94u.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@ofug.org on Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 04:33:21AM %2B0100 References: <xzpr91ydo85.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20010120124200.O69199@canonware.com> <xzpk87ph94u.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 04:33:21AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> writes: > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 08:20:58PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > The next step is to replace the simple_lock with a mutex, and add a > > > top-level mutex to protect zlist. > > FYI, I'm currently testing a patch that completely removes simplelocks. > > Does that mean I should give up reworking vm_zone? No, I just wanted to let you know that I have some patches that touch the same code. My only changes are to convert the simplelocks to mutexes, so your work is still of additional value. Jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010120194641.Q69199>