From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May  5 07:29:26 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B2E37B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  5 May 2003 07:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.netcologne.de (smtp1.netcologne.de [194.8.194.112])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868F843F75
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  5 May 2003 07:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tmseck-usenet@netcologne.de)
Received: from laurel.tmseck.homedns.org (xdsl-213-168-117-66.netcologne.de
	[213.168.117.66])
	by smtp1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 354F238822
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  5 May 2003 16:29:22 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 15739 invoked by uid 1001); 5 May 2003 14:29:45 -0000
Date: 5 May 2003 14:29:45 -0000
Message-ID: <20030505142945.15738.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org>
From: tmseck-lists@netcologne.de (Thomas Seck)
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Organization: private site
In-Reply-To: <20030505052615.R2996@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
X-Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.current
X-Attribution: tms
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Subject: Re: HEADS UP! Kerberos5/Heimdal now default!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 14:29:26 -0000

* Doug Barton (DougB@freebsd.org):

> I'm completely uninterested in what other OSes do in this regard. We've
> been doing a fairly good job in -current of tightening up the default
> install. I see this as a big step in the wrong direction.

I can live with a 'NO_KERBEROS' make option.

Having the kerberos stuff in a separate tarball and de-selectable in
sysinstall is enough to 'satisfy' my needs. I wonder why Kerberos was
always part of the default installation set anyway?

     --Thomas