From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Mar 15 11:21:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from wopr.caltech.edu (wopr.caltech.edu [131.215.240.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A6B37C1D5 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:21:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mph@wopr.caltech.edu) Received: (from mph@localhost) by wopr.caltech.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA43030; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:21:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mph) Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:21:34 -0800 From: Matthew Hunt To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, Ayan George Subject: Re: bin/17395: bin Message-ID: <20000315112134.A42977@wopr.caltech.edu> References: <20000315102824.B40338@wopr.caltech.edu> <58037.953147621@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <58037.953147621@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>; from sheldonh@uunet.co.za on Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:13:41PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:13:41PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > Not that I can think of, no. I'll take a look. Just so that I don't > misundersand _again_, any testing I do should show this version of which > doing exactly what the csh(1) builtin which does, yes? AFAIK, yes. But I have no particular opinion on the matter, so if someone has a decent argument otherwise, that's fine with me. Matt -- Matthew Hunt * Stay close to the Vorlon. http://www.pobox.com/~mph/ * To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message